<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ferrer Dermatology</title>
	<link>http://www.dermatoblog.com</link>
	<description>Many skin colours. One aim: health</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>What are the most frequent histologic findings in drug eruptions?</title>
		<link>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/12/01/what-are-the-most-frequent-histologic-findings-in-drug-eruptions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/12/01/what-are-the-most-frequent-histologic-findings-in-drug-eruptions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mascaró</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical Dermatology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dermatopathology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Drug eruptions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/12/01/what-are-the-most-frequent-histologic-findings-in-drug-eruptions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drug eruptions are a frequent complication seen in approximately 2% to 3 % of hospitalized patients. Some of these eruptions have a characteristic clinical picture such as erythema multiforme, fixed drug eruption, vasculitis, or acute generalized exanthematic pustulosis. However, most patients present with less specific rashes such as morbilliform drug eruptions, or urticaria that can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drug eruptions are a frequent complication seen in approximately 2% to 3 % of hospitalized patients. Some of these eruptions have a characteristic clinical picture such as erythema multiforme, fixed drug eruption, vasculitis, or acute generalized exanthematic pustulosis. However, most patients present with less specific rashes such as morbilliform drug eruptions, or urticaria that can account for up to 95% of cutaneous drug reactions. The diagnosis of drug eruptions is based on clinical history, particularly when the rash is temporally related to the introduction of a new drug, in the last days or weeks. Most drugs that the patient had been taking for years can usually be excluded as triggering agents. In addition, the clinical features of the rash, and, in some cases, the histopathologic examination of a cutaneous biopsy can help in diagnosis.</p>
<p>Although some drug eruptions have histologic patterns that make them easily diagnosed, in most patients histology is ‘‘non-specific’’ or ‘‘non-diagnostic’’. In a study published in the December issue of the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology the authors have made a revision of the of cutaneous drug eruptions diagnosed over a 5-year period. A total of 104 cases were included in the study. In 83% of the cases, the suspected drug or drugs could be narrowed to 3 or fewer. The two most frequent classes of drug associated with the appearance of a rash were antibiotics (45%) and  antiepileptics (15%). 94% of the rashes were morbiliform. Most of the biopsies (80%) showed superficial dermal inflammatory infiltrates in a combined perivascular and interstitial pattern. There were interface changes in 53% of the biopsies. The inflammatory infiltrates was composed of lymphocytes only in 32% of the cases, lymphocytes and eosinophils in 29% of the cases, lymphocytes and neutrophils in 10% of the cases, and lymphocytes, neutrophils and eosinophils in 21% of the cases. Therefore, 50% of the cases contained eosinophils in the infiltrate. In summary, the finding of superficial infiltrates with or without interface changes, with the presence of eosinophils is the most frequent histologic pattern observed in morbilliform drug eruptions. <a href="http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/12/01/what-are-the-most-frequent-histologic-findings-in-drug-eruptions/#more-147" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/12/01/what-are-the-most-frequent-histologic-findings-in-drug-eruptions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defective signaling of vascular endothelial growth factor in hemangiomas</title>
		<link>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/11/08/defective-signaling-of-vascular-endothelial-growth-factor-in-hemangiomas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/11/08/defective-signaling-of-vascular-endothelial-growth-factor-in-hemangiomas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mascaró</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Pediatric Dermatology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/11/08/defective-signaling-of-vascular-endothelial-growth-factor-in-hemangiomas/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Infantile hemangiomas are benign vascular neoplasms formed by endothelial cells that lose their ability to organize in regular vascular structures and form proliferating masses of cells. These tumors are not present at birth and appear during the neonatal period or early infancy. Most infantile hemangiomas are small lesions that are only of cosmetical concern. However [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Infantile hemangiomas are benign vascular neoplasms formed by endothelial cells that lose their ability to organize in regular vascular structures and form proliferating masses of cells. These tumors are not present at birth and appear during the neonatal period or early infancy. Most infantile hemangiomas are small lesions that are only of cosmetical concern. However some lesion can grow as disfiguring masses that can sometimes be life-threatening. </p>
<p>In the November issue of Nature Medicine, a group of researchers from the United States and Belgium have found that there is an imbalanced vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor 1 (VEGFR1) and VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2) function in hemangiomas that could be one of the implicated mechanisms underlying endothelial cell growth in these tumors. In normal endothelial cells VEGF usually binds to VEGFR1 with higher affinity than to VEGFR2. VEGFR1 would act as a regulator of VEGF levels and would decrease VEGFR2 activity on endothelial cells. By contrast, the endothelial cells in hemangiomas have mutations in several genes and this results in the expression of several aberrant proteins complexes (that contain beta-1 integrin, mutated VEGFR2, and TEM8 among others).These aberrant protein complexes in turn decrease the activity of nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT), and this results in turn in that much less VEGFR1 is expressed on these cells. As VEGFR1 is a regulator of VEGF levels, then there is more VEGF that is going to bind to VEGFR2, resulting in an increased endothelial cell growth. </p>
<p>All these findings suggest that antibodies directed against the VEGF, inhibitors of VEGFR2 tyrosine kinase or other agents inhibiting the different components of these signaling pathway (VEGFR2, TEM8, beta1 integrin and NFAT) could be used in the future as promising target-directed therapies for hemangiomas. <a href="http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/11/08/defective-signaling-of-vascular-endothelial-growth-factor-in-hemangiomas/#more-146" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/11/08/defective-signaling-of-vascular-endothelial-growth-factor-in-hemangiomas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MELOE-1: A new target for the immunotherapy of melanoma?</title>
		<link>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/10/27/meloe-1-a-new-target-for-the-immunotherapy-of-melanoma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/10/27/meloe-1-a-new-target-for-the-immunotherapy-of-melanoma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mascaró</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Skin Cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/10/27/meloe-1-a-new-target-for-the-immunotherapy-of-melanoma/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent paper published online first in October 20th in the Journal of Experimental Medicine a group of French researchers have found a new antigenic protein that can be very important in the immune response against melanoma cells. 
They studied a patient that had remained free of melanoma 10 years after the infusion of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent paper published online first in October 20th in the Journal of Experimental Medicine a group of French researchers have found a new antigenic protein that can be very important in the immune response against melanoma cells. </p>
<p>They studied a patient that had remained free of melanoma 10 years after the infusion of  a clone of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL).  These T-cells cells are obtained from the tumor of a patient with late-stage melanoma. They are cultured in vivo, expanded in sufficient numbers, and then infused to different melanoma patients. In this patient the researchers found that the T-cell line recognized a specific antigen that could be found in all melanoma cell lines and, to a lower extent, melanocytes. They named this protein MELOE-1 (melanoma-over expressed antigen-1).</p>
<p>Subsequently, they found that 5 out of 9 patients treated with TILs that did not had relapse had been infused with TILs that contained MELOE-1–specific T cells. In contrast none of the 21 patients treated with TILs who relapsed had been infused with MELOE-1–specific T cells.</p>
<p>These interesting findings suggest that MELOE-1 can be a promising antigenic target for immunotherapy of melanoma in the near future. <a href="http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/10/27/meloe-1-a-new-target-for-the-immunotherapy-of-melanoma/#more-145" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/10/27/meloe-1-a-new-target-for-the-immunotherapy-of-melanoma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A new susceptibility locus for androgenetic alopecia found on chromosome 20p11</title>
		<link>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/10/16/a-new-susceptibility-locus-for-androgenetic-alopecia-found-on-chromosome-20p11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/10/16/a-new-susceptibility-locus-for-androgenetic-alopecia-found-on-chromosome-20p11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mascaró</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical Dermatology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Epidemiology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Genetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/10/16/a-new-susceptibility-locus-for-androgenetic-alopecia-found-on-chromosome-20p11/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two recent separate studies that have been published on-line in the journal Nature Genetics have identified new genetic risk factors for male-pattern baldness. Both studies have found similar results, and they found that there is a susceptibility locus for male-pattern baldness at chromosome 20p11. These studies add a new candidate gene for androgenetic alopecia. Previous [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two recent separate studies that have been published on-line in the journal Nature Genetics have identified new genetic risk factors for male-pattern baldness. Both studies have found similar results, and they found that there is a susceptibility locus for male-pattern baldness at chromosome 20p11. These studies add a new candidate gene for androgenetic alopecia. Previous studies had shown that variants in the androgen receptor gene on the X chromosome were associated with androgenetic alopecia. These investigators found that the combination of both gene variants (the one on chromosome X and the new one found in chromosome 20) were present in 1 out of 7 caucasian men, and that this increased  seven-fold their risk of having androgenetic alopecia.</p>
<p>The gene on chromosome 20p11 has not been identified but it is probable that it harbors an androgen-independent pathway in androgenetic alopecia that may be the target of future therapies. <a href="http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/10/16/a-new-susceptibility-locus-for-androgenetic-alopecia-found-on-chromosome-20p11/#more-144" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/10/16/a-new-susceptibility-locus-for-androgenetic-alopecia-found-on-chromosome-20p11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Imatinib mesilate as a potential treatment for sclerosing skin disorders</title>
		<link>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/10/10/imatinib-mesilate-as-a-potential-treatment-for-sclerosing-skin-disorders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/10/10/imatinib-mesilate-as-a-potential-treatment-for-sclerosing-skin-disorders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 23:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mascaró</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Therapeutics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Clinical Dermatology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/10/10/imatinib-mesilate-as-a-potential-treatment-for-sclerosing-skin-disorders/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Skin fibrosis is the common hallmark of several systemic diseases that cause major disability to patients. These include systemic sclerosis (scleroderma), sclerodermatous graft-versus-host disease, and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Currently there is no standard effective therapy for this group of diseases, as anti-fibrotic therapies are not yet available.
Recently, selective inhibitors of intracellular tyrosine kinases have been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skin fibrosis is the common hallmark of several systemic diseases that cause major disability to patients. These include systemic sclerosis (scleroderma), sclerodermatous graft-versus-host disease, and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Currently there is no standard effective therapy for this group of diseases, as anti-fibrotic therapies are not yet available.</p>
<p>Recently, selective inhibitors of intracellular tyrosine kinases have been evaluated as novel antifibrotic approaches. Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec, Novartis) is a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that blocks two major pro-fibrotic pathways activated in fiibrosing conditions by inhibiting two important tyrosine kinases: c-Abl, a downstream signal in the TGF-beta and PDGF pathways, and the PDGF receptors. Experimental studies have shown that imatinib inhibits collagen synthesis, prevents experimental fibrosis induced by bleomycin, and i by a reduction in thenhibits the proliferation of normal and scleroderma fibroblasts.</p>
<p>Several case reports suggesting the efficacy of this drug in systemic sclerosis, sclerodermatous graft-versus-host disease, and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis have been published in the last few months. For this reason several clinical trials have been started and we will have to wait for these results to know if we are entering in a promising new era of anti-fibrotic therapies.</p>
<p>1. Sfikakis PP, Gorgoulis VG, Katsiari CG, Evangelou K, Kostopoulos C, Black CM.  Imatinib for the treatment of refractory, diffuse systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008; 47:735-7.</p>
<p>2. van Daele PL, Dik WA, Thio HB, van Hal PT, van Laar JA, Hooijkaas H, van Hagen<br />
PM.  Is imatinib mesylate a promising drug in systemic sclerosis? Arthritis Rheum  2008; 58:2549-52.</p>
<p>3. Magro L, Catteau B, Coiteux V, Bruno B, Jouet JP, Yakoub-Agha I. Efficacy of imatinib mesylate in the treatment of refractory sclerodermatous chronic GVHD.<br />
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008 Sep 1. [Epub ahead of print]</p>
<p>4. Moreno-Romero JA, Fernández-Avilés F, Carreras E, Rovira M, Martínez C, Mascaró JM Jr. Imatinib as a potential treatment for sclerodermatous chronic graft-vs-host disease. Arch Dermatol 2008; 144:1106-9.</p>
<p>5. Kay J, High WA.  Imatinib mesylate treatment of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.<br />
Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 58:2543-8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/10/10/imatinib-mesilate-as-a-potential-treatment-for-sclerosing-skin-disorders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early introduction of fish in the diet of children can diminish the chance of developing atopic dermatitis</title>
		<link>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/09/28/early-introduction-of-fish-in-the-diet-of-children-can-diminish-the-chance-of-developing-atopic-dermatitis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/09/28/early-introduction-of-fish-in-the-diet-of-children-can-diminish-the-chance-of-developing-atopic-dermatitis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mascaró</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Pediatric Dermatology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Epidemiology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/09/28/early-introduction-of-fish-in-the-diet-of-children-can-diminish-the-chance-of-developing-atopic-dermatitis/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Atopic dermatitis (AD) or atopic eczema is a chronic inflammatory condition that usually begins in childhood. The prevalence of AD has been rising in all industrialized countries during the last decades and it currently affects 10 to 20% of children. Although there is a genetic basis for AD, the underlying causes remain unknown.
In a recent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atopic dermatitis (AD) or atopic eczema is a chronic inflammatory condition that usually begins in childhood. The prevalence of AD has been rising in all industrialized countries during the last decades and it currently affects 10 to 20% of children. Although there is a genetic basis for AD, the underlying causes remain unknown.</p>
<p>In a recent study published in the Archives of Disease in Childhood, a group of Swedish investigators have found that introducing fish in the diet of babies before they are nine months old may cut their risk of developing AD.</p>
<p>The investigators followed the children from a cohort of 8176 families, who were sent a questionnaire about diet and home environment when the children were six months of age. These families were then sent another questionnaire when the child was twelve months of age. 4941 families completed the two questionnaires. The prevalence of eczema was13% at six months, and 20% at twelve month.</p>
<p>Genetic factors were found to be the most important risk factor for developing eczema, as having either the mother or a sibling with eczema doubled the risk of a child to develop eczema. Breast feeding, the age at which dairy products were introduced, and the presence of a furry pet in the home had no detectable influence on eczema. Interestingly, the introduction of fish into the diet before nine months diminished the risk of developing eczema by 25 percent compared with children who never ate it. There was no link with the amount of fish or type of fish. Although one explanation might be that fish is rich in omega-3 fatty acids, the investigators found no differences between children who ate white fish, and those who ate other types of fish richer in omega-3. <a href="http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/09/28/early-introduction-of-fish-in-the-diet-of-children-can-diminish-the-chance-of-developing-atopic-dermatitis/#more-142" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/09/28/early-introduction-of-fish-in-the-diet-of-children-can-diminish-the-chance-of-developing-atopic-dermatitis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recommendations issued on screening for latent tuberculosis infection in patients with psoriasis treated with systemic therapies</title>
		<link>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/09/22/recommendations-issued-on-screening-for-latent-tuberculosis-infection-in-patients-with-psoriasis-treated-with-systemic-therapies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/09/22/recommendations-issued-on-screening-for-latent-tuberculosis-infection-in-patients-with-psoriasis-treated-with-systemic-therapies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mascaró</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Psoriasis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Clinical Dermatology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/09/22/recommendations-issued-on-screening-for-latent-tuberculosis-infection-in-patients-with-psoriasis-treated-with-systemic-therapies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists (infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab) are new medications that have proven to be very effective in the treatment of  psoriasis. However all these medications have been implicated in an increased rate of tuberculosis (TB) infection, th to reactivation of latent TB infection. For this reason screening for latent of active [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists (infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab) are new medications that have proven to be very effective in the treatment of  psoriasis. However all these medications have been implicated in an increased rate of tuberculosis (TB) infection, th to reactivation of latent TB infection. For this reason screening for latent of active or latent TB has been recommended in these patients. In a recent publication at the Journal of the American Academy  of Dermatology the medical board of the National Psoriasis Foundation (a patient-driven non-profit organization form the United States) has made a consensus statement based on an extensive review of the literature.</p>
<p>This medical board recommends to screen for TB by using tuberculin skin tests all patients before initiating any of the TNF antagonists. In additio these authors recommend that this also should be done ton any patient before initiating any immunosuppressive medication (such as methotrexate, cyclosporine, alefaceft, or efalizumab). This would not be needed for topical therapies or phototherapy.</p>
<p>Tuberculin skin tests are considered positive if there is an induration equal or greater than 5 mm at 48 hours. Some person might have false negative tests due and in Europe anergy testing and ‘‘booster’’ tuberculin tests are recommended, but this is not the current practice in the United States. The wholeblood interferon-g release There are more sensitive and specific assays based in whole-blood interferon-gamma release. These can be positive in individuals with latent TB whose tuberculin skin tests are negative, or help to diagnose a latent TB in patients with a history of BCG vaccination (where a positive tuberculin skin test is the rule). However these assays are not widely available.</p>
<p>When these tests are positive and an active TB has been ruled out (by chest radiograph), TB infection prophylaxis with 9 months of isoniazid (preferred) or 4 months ryphampycin has to be started. Treatment with TNF antagonists should be initiated only after 1-2 months ot prophylaxis has been done. <a href="http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/09/22/recommendations-issued-on-screening-for-latent-tuberculosis-infection-in-patients-with-psoriasis-treated-with-systemic-therapies/#more-141" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/09/22/recommendations-issued-on-screening-for-latent-tuberculosis-infection-in-patients-with-psoriasis-treated-with-systemic-therapies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patients with a history of nonmelanoma skin cancer have a higher risk to develop other cancers</title>
		<link>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/09/03/patients-with-a-history-of-nonmelanoma-skin-cancer-have-a-higher-risk-to-develop-other-cancers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/09/03/patients-with-a-history-of-nonmelanoma-skin-cancer-have-a-higher-risk-to-develop-other-cancers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mascaró</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Skin Cancer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Epidemiology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/09/03/patients-with-a-history-of-nonmelanoma-skin-cancer-have-a-higher-risk-to-develop-other-cancers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute a group of researchers from several centres in the United States have found that a previous history of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) doubles the risk of another cancer like lung, colon or breast cancer. The authors performed a prospective cohort study using [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute a group of researchers from several centres in the United States have found that a previous history of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) doubles the risk of another cancer like lung, colon or breast cancer. The authors performed a prospective cohort study using the CLUE  II cohort, in Washington County, Maryland, United States. They compared a group of persons with no personal history of NMSC (n = 18405) with a group who had pathologically confirmed NMSC in the past (n = 769) during a 16-year follow-up period. They found  that patients with NMSC there was an incidence of cancer of 293.5 per 10 000 person-years, while this incidence was only of 77.8 per 10 000 person-years in those with no history of NMSC. The risk was higher among younger individuals, and it was observed for both basal and squamous cell carcinomas. Site-specific analyses yielded associations that were much stronger for melanoma (RR = 7.94); and similar for lung (RR = 1.92), colorectal (RR = 1.78), and breast (RR = 1.64) cancers; and somewhat weaker for prostate cancer (RR = 1.27). </p>
<p>Therefore NMSC may be a clinical marker of cancer risk. This may be due to an inadequate ability to repair DNA, or alternatively, ultraviolet radiation exposure that causes NMSC may induce some degree of immunosuppression resulting in an increased risk for internal cancers, as well as of NMSC. <a href="http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/09/03/patients-with-a-history-of-nonmelanoma-skin-cancer-have-a-higher-risk-to-develop-other-cancers/#more-140" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/09/03/patients-with-a-history-of-nonmelanoma-skin-cancer-have-a-higher-risk-to-develop-other-cancers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Efficacy and safety of biologicals for psoriasis</title>
		<link>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/08/27/efficacy-and-safety-of-biologicals-for-psoriasis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/08/27/efficacy-and-safety-of-biologicals-for-psoriasis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mascaró</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Psoriasis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Therapeutics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/08/27/efficacy-and-safety-of-biologicals-for-psoriasis/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several new biological agents have been introduced for the treatment of psoriasis in the last few years. These include alefaceft, efalizumab, and the anti-TNF agents etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab. In a recent paper from Brimhall et al published in the August issue of the British Journal of Dermatology,  the authors performed a metha-analysis on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several new biological agents have been introduced for the treatment of psoriasis in the last few years. These include alefaceft, efalizumab, and the anti-TNF agents etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab. In a recent paper from Brimhall et al published in the August issue of the British Journal of Dermatology,  the authors performed a metha-analysis on the safety and efficacy of all these agents (except adalumimab, that was not approved for this indication when the study was done). They searched for randomized, controlled, double-blind, monotherapy trials that had been done until July 2006 , and finally selected 16 studies including 7931 patients (5454 treatment and 2477 placebo patients): 3 trials of alefacept (n = 1289), 5 trials of efalizumab (n = 3130), 4 trials of etanercept (n = 2017) and 4 trials of infliximab (n = 1495). </p>
<p>They observed that the relative risk (compared with placebo) of PASI 75 achievement was, respectively, 4, 7, 12 and 19 for maintenance doses of alefacept, efalizumab, etanercept and infliximab. In addition, they calculated that the number needed to treat to obtain at least a patient with a PASI 75 improvement was 8 for alefacept, 4 for efalizumab, 3 for etanercept, and 2 for infliximab. Therefore they found that the efficacy of these treatments was in decreasing order of rank: infliximab, etanercept, efalizumab and alefacept. The authors stress that these were not head to head trials, and therefore future studies will add more information on these data of efficacy.</p>
<p>When dealing with safety the authors found that there was a statistically significant increased risk of adverse events  (compared with placebo) with  alefacept (9% more), efalizumab (15% more), and infliximab (18% more). Common adverse events with with alefaceft were pharyngitis, chills and headache. Severe adverse events were uncommon, but they found coronary artery disorder (n = 4), cellulitis (n = 3) and myocardial infarction (n = 3). For efaluzimab they found that common adverse events were headaches, infection and chills. Severe adverse events from efaluzimab reported in FDA reviews included hospitalization for psoriasis flare (n = 17), serious infection (n = 7), and thrombocytopenia (n = 5).  Etanercept common adverse events included injection-site reaction, headache and upper respiratory tract infection. The most common severe adverse events in etanercept treated patients were malignancy (n = 10), serious infection (n = 4) and worsening psoriasis (n = 3).  Infliximab common adverse events were upper respiratory tract infection, headache, increased hepatic enzymes and infection. Some of the most common severe adverse events reported with infliximab were malignancy (n = 12), serious infection (n = 6), serious infusion reaction (n = 4) and lupus-like syndrome (n = 4). The authors calculated that the number needed to harm (this is the total number of patients that had to be treated to get any adverse event) was 15 for alefacept,  9 for efalizumab,  46 for etanercept, and 9 for infliximab. Therefore they found that the safety of these treatments was in decreasing order of rank: etanercept, alefacept, efalizumab, and infliximab.</p>
<p>Limitations of this study include that it has been done on a short term treatment basis (most are only 12 weeks), and that there is a short follow-up for adverse events (10–30 weeks). It is based on clinical trials and does not fully reflect ‘real life’ treatments. </p>
<p> <a href="http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/08/27/efficacy-and-safety-of-biologicals-for-psoriasis/#more-139" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/08/27/efficacy-and-safety-of-biologicals-for-psoriasis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Psoriasis is not triggered by beta-blockers</title>
		<link>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/08/19/psoriasis-is-not-triggered-by-beta-blockers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/08/19/psoriasis-is-not-triggered-by-beta-blockers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mascaró</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Psoriasis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Clinical Dermatology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Drug eruptions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/08/19/psoriasis-is-not-triggered-by-beta-blockers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several factors have been traditionally described as triggers of psoriasis. These include among others stress, infections, trauma, alcohol consumption, and drugs. Among these the most frequently cited in the literature are beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting
enzyme inhibitors, antimalarials, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, lithium, as well as withdrawal of systemic steroids.
To explore the potential association between the risks of developing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several factors have been traditionally described as triggers of psoriasis. These include among others stress, infections, trauma, alcohol consumption, and drugs. Among these the most frequently cited in the literature are beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting<br />
enzyme inhibitors, antimalarials, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, lithium, as well as withdrawal of systemic steroids.</p>
<p>To explore the potential association between the risks of developing psoriasis for the first time with the intake of beta-blockers or other antihypertensive drugs a group from Switzerland performed a large case-control study that was recently published in the British Journal of Dermatology. The authors used a large database from general practitioners in the U.K. They identified 36.702 patients who had been diagnosed of psoriasis for the first time between 1994 and 2005, and used the same number of matched controls. They assessed the exposure history for beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors,  angiotensin II antagonists, calcium channel blockers, diuretics or clonidine.</p>
<p>The authors found that there was no increased risk of psoriasis among patients that used any of the antihypertensive medications. In relation to beta-blokers they found that current long-term use of these medications was associated with a relative risk estimate of 1,10 (95% CI 1,01–1,20). So, in conclusion this large study does not support that the use of beta-blocker may induce the development or trigger psoriasis. <a href="http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/08/19/psoriasis-is-not-triggered-by-beta-blockers/#more-138" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/08/19/psoriasis-is-not-triggered-by-beta-blockers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anal infection by with human papillomavirus is frequent among heterosexual men</title>
		<link>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/08/07/anal-infection-by-with-human-papillomavirus-is-frequent-among-heterosexual-men/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/08/07/anal-infection-by-with-human-papillomavirus-is-frequent-among-heterosexual-men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mascaró</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Clinical Dermatology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Skin Cancer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Infectious Diseases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/08/07/anal-infection-by-with-human-papillomavirus-is-frequent-among-heterosexual-men/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent study published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases reveals that anal infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) is fequent among heterosexual men. Previous studies have shown that the prevalence of anal HPV infection can be more than 50% in heterosexual men with HIV infection and men who have sex with men. 
The investigators (from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent study published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases reveals that anal infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) is fequent among heterosexual men. Previous studies have shown that the prevalence of anal HPV infection can be more than 50% in heterosexual men with HIV infection and men who have sex with men. </p>
<p>The investigators (from several centers across the US) studied a cohort of 463 men aged 18-40, who reported having sex with a woman in the preceding year. These men completed a questionnaire, and were sampled for HPV DNA on genital and anal skin using PCR based techniques. When HPV was detected further genotyping was done. </p>
<p>241 of the men were excluded (if they acknowledged having had sex with men or had not been asked or had refused to answer questions about it.or did not answer the question). Of the 222 men that were finally included in the study anal HPV infection was found in 24.8% (n=55). Of these 55 men, 29.1% (n=16) had only an anal infection while most of them (70.9%, n= 39) had both an anal and another anatomical site (or semen) infection. Only nine men had warts (reported by clinician) at any site, and none had visible lesions at anal sites. Oncogenic HPV were found in 5.9% of men with anal infection, but in men with anal canal infection this rate rose up to 33.3%.</p>
<p>Risk factors associated with anal HPVinfection were the lifetime number of female sex partners and the frequency of sex with females during the preceding month. </p>
<p>In summary the data from this study show that about one in four heterosexual men can be infected by HPV and, that in many cases, these can be of the oncogenic subtypes. These data are important because many physicians do not consider anal HPV infection  an important issue in heterosexual men or in men non-infected by the HIV. <a href="http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/08/07/anal-infection-by-with-human-papillomavirus-is-frequent-among-heterosexual-men/#more-137" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/08/07/anal-infection-by-with-human-papillomavirus-is-frequent-among-heterosexual-men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adjuvant therapy with pegylated interferon for patients with melanoma with positive nodes</title>
		<link>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/07/16/adjuvant-therapy-with-pegylated-interferon-for-patients-with-melanoma-with-positive-nodes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/07/16/adjuvant-therapy-with-pegylated-interferon-for-patients-with-melanoma-with-positive-nodes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mascaró</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Therapeutics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Skin Cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/07/16/adjuvant-therapy-with-pegylated-interferon-for-patients-with-melanoma-with-positive-nodes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the last years, interferon has been the adjuvant therapy of choice in patients with high risk melanomas (patient&#8217;s with Brelow thickness ≥4 mm, or with positive nodes). However the dose and routes of administration are not standarized from institution to institution, and the efficacy remains controversial. In a recent report published in the The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the last years, interferon has been the adjuvant therapy of choice in patients with high risk melanomas (patient&#8217;s with Brelow thickness ≥4 mm, or with positive nodes). However the dose and routes of administration are not standarized from institution to institution, and the efficacy remains controversial. In a recent report published in the The Lancet, the results of a large phase III trial are summarized. The authors treated 1256 patients with melanoma with positive nodes (stage III) after surgical resection either with  pegylated interferon alfa-2b (n=627) or with observation alone (n=629). They found that patients treated with pegylated interferon alfa-2b had 15 % less risk of recurrences than the other group. Distant metastasis-free survival was also better in patients treated with pegylated interferon, but this was not statistically significant. There was no difference in overall survival. Side effects were higher in the group treated with pegylated interferon (fatigue and depression were the most common side effects). This study suggests that in patients that are found to have a positive node after sentinel node procedure (microscopic nodal involvement), or who have macroscopic nodal involvement (palpable lymph nodes) pegylated interferon is an alternative to the standard treatment with high dose interferon.<br />
 <a href="http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/07/16/adjuvant-therapy-with-pegylated-interferon-for-patients-with-melanoma-with-positive-nodes/#more-136" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/07/16/adjuvant-therapy-with-pegylated-interferon-for-patients-with-melanoma-with-positive-nodes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A new immunotherapy for metastatic malignant melanoma</title>
		<link>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/07/04/a-new-immunotherapy-for-metastatic-malignant-melanoma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/07/04/a-new-immunotherapy-for-metastatic-malignant-melanoma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mascaró</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Skin Cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/07/04/a-new-immunotherapy-for-metastatic-malignant-melanoma/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the June 19 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine a group of researchers from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (Seattle, USA) report fort he first time that a tumor-specific, autologous CD4 T-cell clone expanded in vitro induced a complete remission in a single patient with metastatic melanoma. 
The patient was a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the June 19 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine a group of researchers from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (Seattle, USA) report fort he first time that a tumor-specific, autologous CD4 T-cell clone expanded in vitro induced a complete remission in a single patient with metastatic melanoma. </p>
<p>The patient was a 52 year old man with melanoma who had lung and abdominal metastases that had not responded to high-dose interferon-alpha, interleukin-2, and local excision.  T cells were extacted from the patient&#8217;s blood and co-cultured in vitro with autologous dendritic cells primed to recognize one melanoma antigen called NY-ESO-1. A CD4-positive T-cell clone specific for NY-ESO-1 was isolated and grown in vitro.  The expanded cells were infused to the patient, who developed transient lymphopenia, low-grade fever, and myalgia for 3 days. Two months after the infusion the patient was disease-free, and is disease free after two years of follow-up. <a href="http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/07/04/a-new-immunotherapy-for-metastatic-malignant-melanoma/#more-134" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/07/04/a-new-immunotherapy-for-metastatic-malignant-melanoma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ustekinumab: A new biologic for the treatment of psoriasis</title>
		<link>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/06/03/ustekinumab-a-new-biologic-for-the-treatment-of-psoriasis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/06/03/ustekinumab-a-new-biologic-for-the-treatment-of-psoriasis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 22:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mascaró</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Therapeutics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dermatoblog.com/2008/06/03/ustekinumab-a-new-biologic-for-the-treatment-of-psoriasis/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Systemic therapies in psoriasis where started in the fifties with methotrexate. Later on, the synthetic retinoids, etretinate, and more recently acitretin were introduced. The third systemic drug that was approved for psoriasis in the 20th century was ciclosporin. In the last decade a group of more targeted therapies for psoriasis (collectively known as biological agents) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Systemic therapies in psoriasis where started in the fifties with methotrexate. Later on, the synthetic retinoids, etretinate, and more recently acitretin were introduced. The third systemic drug that was approved for psoriasis in the 20th century was ciclosporin. In the last decade a group of more targeted therapies for psoriasis (collectively known as biological agents) have been introduced in its management. These new agents are targeting T-cell surface proteins (alefacept, and efalizumab), or tumour necrosis factor alpha (etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab). As recent studies have suggested an important role for T helper 17 cells and the interleukins 12 and 23, several studies have investigated the role of targeting these molecules in psoriasis. In the May 17 issue of the Lancet, two articles describe the result of the PHOENIX 1 and 2 trials (that were phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies). These studies evaluate the efficacy and safety in moderate to severe psoriasis of  subcutaneous injections of ustekinumab, a human monoclonal antibody against the p40 protein (a subunit shared by both human interleukin 12 and 23). Patients received one dose of ustekinumab (45 mg or 90 mg) or placebo at weeks 0 and 4, and then every 12 weeks. Around 66 to 76% of the patients receiving ustekinumab achieved a PASI75 response, while this was only found in less than 5% of the patients receiving placebo. There were no differences in the proportion of side effects between patients receiving ustekinumab or placebo groups. The efficacy of ustekinumab was preserved with maintenance therapy (every 3 months) during 76 (PHOENIX 1 trial) or 52 weeks (PHOENIX 2 trial). When patients were withdrawn from ustekinumab, psoriasis lesions gradually recurred after 3 months. In addition, one of the trials identified a small proportion of partial responders, and the factors predicting this partial response were found to be a higher bodyweight, a history of inadequate response to one or more biological agent, a longer history of psoriasis, and a history of psoriatic arthritis. <a href="http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/06/03/ustekinumab-a-new-biologic-for-the-treatment-of-psoriasis/#more-133" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/06/03/ustekinumab-a-new-biologic-for-the-treatment-of-psoriasis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T-Helper 17 Cells are present in Psoriatic Plaques</title>
		<link>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/05/20/t-helper-17-cells-are-present-in-psoriatic-plaques/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/05/20/t-helper-17-cells-are-present-in-psoriatic-plaques/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 23:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mascaró</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Psoriasis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dermatoblog.com/2008/05/20/t-helper-17-cells-are-present-in-psoriatic-plaques/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T helper (Th) 17 cells are a novel T-cell subset that has been very recently implicated in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. The survival and proliferation of Th17 cells is stimulated by interleukin 23, that thus regulates Th17 cells. Interleukin 23 also stimulates dermal Th17 cells to produce the so-called “Th17 cytokines” (IL-17A, IL-17F, tumor necrosis [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T helper (Th) 17 cells are a novel T-cell subset that has been very recently implicated in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. The survival and proliferation of Th17 cells is stimulated by interleukin 23, that thus regulates Th17 cells. Interleukin 23 also stimulates dermal Th17 cells to produce the so-called “Th17 cytokines” (IL-17A, IL-17F, tumor necrosis factor, IL-21, and IL-22). One of these cytokines, IL-22, has been shown to be induce keratinocyte hyperproliferation in psoriasis. Targeting of these cytokines may be very effective to lead to dramatic clinical improvement in patients with psoriasis in the future. In the May issue of the Journal of Investigative Dermatology, a group of researchers from New York show for the first time that IL-17A-producing cells (Th17 cells) are present in the dermis of psoriatic plaques. Psoriasis plaque dermis contained a mean of 6.2% of cells secreting IL-17A, while normal-appearing skin contained a mean of 0.5% of cells. These results, as well as those from other recent works published in research journals suggest that IL-23 and Th17 cells are key mediators of disease pathogenesis. Some drugs targeting the IL-23/Th17 cell inflammatory pathway are being tested right now and their potential role in the treatment of psoriasis will soon be known.</p>
<p>Psoriasis Vulgaris Lesions Contain Discrete Populations of Th1 and Th17 T Cells</p>
<p>Lowes MA, et al</p>
<p><em>Journal of Investigative Dermatology </em>2008; 128:1207–1211.</p>
<p>The importance of T helper 17 (Th17) cells in inflammation and autoimmunity is now being appreciated. We analyzed psoriasis skin lesions and peripheral blood for the presence of IL-17-producing T cells. We localized Th17 cells predominantly to the dermis of psoriasis skin lesions, confirmed that IL-17 mRNA increased with disease activity, and demonstrated that IL-17 mRNA expression normalized with cyclosporine therapy. IL-22 mRNA expression mirrored IL-17 and both were downregulated in parallel with keratin 16. Th17 cells are a discrete population, separate from Th1 cells (which are also in psoriasis lesions), and Th2 cells. Our findings suggest that psoriasis is a mixed Th1 and Th17 inflammatory environment. Th17 cells may be proximal regulators of psoriatic skin inflammation, and warrant further attention as therapeutic targets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dermatoblog.com/2008/05/20/t-helper-17-cells-are-present-in-psoriatic-plaques/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
