This entry was posted
on Thursday, December 17th, 2009 at 1:53 pm and is filed under General.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
A tricky case!
A pseudo-network is perfectly seen as the main part of the lesion. However, in my opinion the diagnostic clue corresponds to the small gray-bluish foci at the top of the picture. This pigmented foci is composed of small globules out of focus. I do not clearly see telangiectasia.
I will dare to diagnose a tumor collision between a benign melanocytic lesion and a very small basal cell carcinoma.
Ther are two lesions:
On the upper side of lesion, it seems to be a basal cell carcinoma, as I see blue nests and fine telangiectaisas although they are not very well focused.
On the lower side of the lesion, I see an atypical pseudo network, so it could be a lentigo maligna.
A tricky case!
A pseudo-network is perfectly seen as the main part of the lesion. However, in my opinion the diagnostic clue corresponds to the small gray-bluish foci at the top of the picture. This pigmented foci is composed of small globules out of focus. I do not clearly see telangiectasia.
I will dare to diagnose a tumor collision between a benign melanocytic lesion and a very small basal cell carcinoma.
Thanks.
David
the collision between basal cell carcinoma and early malignant lentigo would be an option.
Thanks!
David
Ther are two lesions:
On the upper side of lesion, it seems to be a basal cell carcinoma, as I see blue nests and fine telangiectaisas although they are not very well focused.
On the lower side of the lesion, I see an atypical pseudo network, so it could be a lentigo maligna.
considering the age of patient .. and the long history of the lesion .. its most probable basal cell carcinoma ..